Influencer disclosure rules by country
In most countries, a free product counts as payment. If a creator posts about something your brand sent them, the post usually has to say so, clearly and at the start. The exact words change from country to country. This guide lists them, with a link to each regulator’s own page.
The short answer
- Yes, gifts usually count. In most of the countries below, a product sent for free is a benefit, like money. If the creator then posts about it, the post must show the connection to the brand.
- Say it up front. The label goes at the start of the caption or on the video itself, not after “more”, not in a list of hashtags, and not only in the bio.
- Use the local language. Germany expects “Werbung” or “Anzeige”, France “Publicité” or “Collaboration commerciale”, Korea “광고” or “협찬”. Several regulators say an English “#ad” is not enough for a local audience.
- The platform’s label helps, but isn’t always enough. Instagram’s “Paid partnership” label and TikTok’s content disclosure setting are accepted in some countries and treated as an extra in others.
- The brand is responsible too. Most regulators expect the brand to tell creators how to disclose and to check that they do.
Why a free product counts
Disclosure rules exist so that people can judge a recommendation. A creator who received the product for free may talk about it differently from one who bought it. Regulators call this a “material connection” (United States, Canada, India), “consideration” or “a benefit” (Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands) or an “economic interest” (South Korea). In each case, a free product is on the list.
A few places draw a line between a gift with no conditions and a gift sent as part of a deal. In the United Kingdom, the advertising regulator (ASA) covers the post only if the brand also had some control over it, but consumer law (enforced by the CMA) still requires the gift to be disclosed. In Brazil, a thank-you post for a gift is not an ad under the CONAR guide, but it must still mention the brand that sent it. In Japan and Sweden, it depends on the circumstances.
Disclosure rules in 14 countries
| Country | Rules and regulator | Must a free gift be disclosed? | Words to use | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FTC Endorsement Guides (16 CFR Part 255, revised 2023) | Yes. A free product is a material connection. | “Ad”, “Advertisement”, “Sponsored”. For a gift only: “Gifted by [brand]”. “Gifted” without the brand is ambiguous. | FTC |
| United Kingdom | Consumer protection law (CMA) and the CAP Code (ASA) | Yes. The CMA says gifts must be labelled even if there is no obligation to post. | “Ad”, “Advert”, “Advertising”, “Advertisement”. The CMA lists “#gifted”, “#spon”, “#sponsored”, “#collab” and “thank you” as unclear. | CMA, ASA |
| Germany | Media State Treaty, enforced by the state media authorities (die Medienanstalten) | Yes, if the product was sent by the brand and the post is not fully independent of it. | “Werbung” or “Anzeige” as the first word, or “bezahlte Werbepartnerschaft”. “Ad”, “sponsored by” and “PR sample” are not enough. | Medienanstalten guide (PDF) |
| France | Law no. 2023-451 of 9 June 2023 on commercial influence (amended in November 2024), enforced by the DGCCRF | Yes. The government lists “products received” as consideration. | “Publicité” or “Collaboration commerciale”, or an equivalent mention. The brand must be named. | economie.gouv.fr |
| Spain | General Audiovisual Communication Law 13/2022 and Royal Decree 444/2024 for the largest creators; the AUTOCONTROL, aea and IAB Spain code of conduct (2025) | Yes, when the product is sent as part of a collaboration. The code lists free delivery of a product as consideration. | “Publicidad”, “publi”, “en colaboración con”, “colaboración pagada”, “patrocinado por”. Not enough: “Regalo de [marca]”, “Gracias a [marca]”, “Colab”, “sp”, or “Ad” in English. | AUTOCONTROL code (PDF), BOE |
| Italy | AGCOM guidelines (2024, updated by Resolution 197/25/CONS) for creators with 500,000 followers or 1 million average monthly views on one platform; the IAP Digital Chart for everyone | Yes. The IAP Digital Chart asks for a note on posts about products sent for free. | Paid: “Pubblicità/Advertising”, “Sponsorizzato da [brand]”, “Promosso da [brand]”, “In collaborazione con [brand]”. Gift: “Prodotto inviato da [brand]”. | AGCOM (PDF), IAP (PDF) |
| Netherlands | Advertising Code for Social Media & Influencer Marketing (RSM), Stichting Reclame Code; the Media Act for large video creators | Yes. Free products given so that the creator posts about them are a “relevant relationship”. | “#ad”, “#reclame”, “#advertentie”, or a sentence such as “Gekregen van @[brand]”. The hashtag goes at the start. | Reclame Code |
| Sweden | Marketing Practices Act, enforced by the Swedish Consumer Agency (Konsumentverket) | It depends. The agency says posts about PR gifts are not settled in case law and depend on the circumstances. Paid posts are always marketing. | “Reklam”, clear at first glance. | Konsumentverket |
| Australia | Australian Consumer Law (ACCC) and section 2.7 of the AANA Code of Ethics (Ad Standards) | Usually. The AANA practice note covers free products given to promote a brand. Ad Standards looks at whether the brand had a reasonable degree of control. | “#ad”, “Advert”, “Advertising”, “Branded Content”, “Paid Partnership”, “Paid Promotion”. “#sp”, “spon”, “gifted” and “collab” may not be enough. | Ad Standards, ACCC |
| Canada | Competition Act (Competition Bureau) and the Ad Standards disclosure guidelines (October 2025) | Yes. | “#ad”, “#sponsored”. For a gift with no required post: “#Gifted” or “#GiftedProduct”, with the brand named. Use French for French content. | Ad Standards, Competition Bureau |
| Brazil | CONAR guide for marketing and advertising by digital influencers (May 2026, applied from 1 June 2026) | Yes. A gift with no agreement is not an ad under the guide, but the post must mention the relationship. | Paid: “#publi”, “#publicidade”, or the platform’s tool. Gift: “#recebido”, “Obrigada à [marca] pelo [produto]”. English “#ad” may not be understood. | CONAR |
| India | ASCI Guidelines for Influencer Advertising in Digital Media | Yes, including free products the creator did not ask for. | “Advertisement”, “Ad”, “Sponsored”, “Collaboration”, “Partnership”, “Free gift”, in English or in the language of the post. | ASCI (PDF) |
| South Korea | KFTC guidelines on endorsements and testimonials in advertising (revised 1 December 2024) | Yes. The product itself is an economic benefit. | “광고”, “협찬”, “협찬 받았음”, “무료 상품”, at the start of the post or as the first hashtag. Not enough: “체험단”, “선물”. English “AD” or “Sponsor” does not count for a Korean audience. | KFTC guideline (law.go.kr) |
| Japan | Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations: the stealth marketing rule, in force since 1 October 2023 (Consumer Affairs Agency) | It depends. A free product with a request to post can make the post the company’s own ad. A post the creator makes of their own free will is not. | “広告”, “宣伝”, “プロモーション”, “PR”, or a sentence such as “A社から商品の提供を受けて投稿している”. | Consumer Affairs Agency Q&A |
Four markets have their own page, with each regulator’s rules in more detail: the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Japan.
Details that change by country
Germany: the label is the first word
The German media authorities ask for “Werbung” or “Anzeige” as the first word of the caption, in a clear and readable font. Abbreviations and foreign words such as “ad”, “sponsored by” or “PR sample” are not enough. If a product sent for free only appears in passing, a shorter note such as “enthält Produktplatzierung” is enough, and only when the products from one brand are worth more than 100 euros. If the product is the focus of the scene, it is advertising and needs the full label.
United Kingdom: “#gifted” is not on the list
The CMA’s guide for influencers says posts about gifts must be labelled, even when there is no obligation to post. It lists “#gifted” and “#sponsored” among the unclear terms and asks for “Ad” or “Advert” instead. The ASA applies the CAP Code when the brand also had control over the content, for example by asking for a positive post in return.
Spain, Korea and Brazil: English isn’t enough
Spain’s code of conduct says a label in another language, such as “Ad” or “Advertising”, should not be used. Korea’s guidelines say “AD”, “PR” and “Sponsor” do not count as the same language for a Korean audience. Brazil’s CONAR guide says English terms may not be understood. The FTC, Canada and India also ask for the disclosure in the language of the post.
Japan: the company is the one regulated
Japan’s stealth marketing rule regulates the company that decided the content of the advertising, not the creator. A post counts as the company’s ad when the company was involved in its content, for example by giving the product and asking for a post. The Consumer Affairs Agency recommends keeping a label such as “広告” on screen for the whole video, because viewers who start watching later can miss a label shown only at the start.
Italy: tell the creator when you ship
Under the IAP Digital Chart, a brand that sends a product for free must tell the creator, clearly and when it sends the product, that their posts about it need a note such as “prodotto inviato da [brand]”. For videos, the note goes at the start, written or spoken.
Where the label goes
Almost every regulator above says the same thing about placement. The disclosure must be seen at first glance, without the viewer having to do anything.
- At the start of the caption. Instagram and TikTok cut captions off after a line or two. A label after the cut, behind “more”, is easy to miss (FTC, ASCI, Spain, Brazil, Korea).
- Not in a list of hashtags. “#ad” as the twelfth hashtag doesn’t count as clear (CMA, FTC, Canada, the Netherlands, Korea).
- In the video, not only under it. For TikTok, Reels and Shorts, the FTC says the disclosure should be in the video itself, not just in the description. Say it, show it on screen, or both, depending on how the product is presented.
- On every post. A note in the bio or a line saying the whole account contains ads is not enough (FTC, ASCI, Germany).
- For long videos and live streams, repeat it. People who join later should see it too (FTC, ASCI, Korea, the Netherlands).
Platform labels: helpful, not always enough
Each platform has its own disclosure tool: Instagram’s “Paid partnership” label, TikTok’s content disclosure setting (shown as “Paid partnership”) and YouTube’s paid promotion setting (shown as “Includes paid promotion”). Each platform’s own policy asks creators to use them for gifted products too, and all three say the creator is still responsible for following the law.
Regulators treat these labels differently. The German media authorities accept a platform label on its own if it says “Werbung”, “Anzeige” or “bezahlte Werbepartnerschaft”. Spain’s code and Brazil’s CONAR guide recommend using the platform tools. The CMA accepts them if the label is clear and easy to see. The FTC and ASCI say not to rely on the platform tool alone, and to add your own disclosure. How each label works is explained in our guide to the paid partnership label.
What brands are responsible for
A brand can’t hand all of this to the creator. Regulators in most of these countries hold the brand responsible too, and some put the main responsibility on the brand:
- United States. The FTC says advertisers need reasonable programs to train and monitor the people who promote their products, and are responsible for what others do on their behalf.
- United Kingdom. The CMA tells brands they have a responsibility to make sure content promoting them is labelled, to give clear instructions with gifts, and to check the content themselves.
- Sweden. Konsumentverket says the company has the main responsibility, and that this can’t be passed to influencers or agencies by contract.
- Japan. The stealth marketing rule applies to the company, not the creator.
- Netherlands, India, Canada. The codes make the brand responsible for informing creators and for acting when a disclosure is missing, alongside the creator.
A checklist for brands
- 01
Decide which countries apply
Look at where the creator lives and where their audience is. US rules apply if it is reasonably foreseeable that a post will reach US consumers, even when the creator lives abroad.
- 02
Write the exact words in your gifting note
Don’t leave the creator to guess. Give the label to use in their language and where to put it, for example “Werbung” in Germany or “Publicité” in France, at the start of the caption.
- 03
Ask for the platform label as well
Ask creators to turn on Instagram’s paid partnership label, TikTok’s content disclosure setting or YouTube’s paid promotion box, in addition to their own words.
- 04
Ask for it in the video
For short videos, ask for the disclosure on screen or said out loud near the start, not only in the caption.
- 05
Check every post you gifted
Watch the posts that show your product, including the ones that don’t tag you, and check that the disclosure is there and visible before “more”.
- 06
Ask for a fix, and keep a record
If the label is missing or buried, ask the creator to correct it. Keep a note of what you asked and when. That record is part of the monitoring regulators expect.
To check one post now, paste its link or caption into our free disclosure checker. For the US rules in more detail, read what the FTC asks for gifted products.
How Pozto helps
Pozto watches the creators you gifted on TikTok, Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts and finds the posts that show your product, tagged or not. For each one, it reads the caption for disclosure words in many languages and notes whether they come before the caption is cut off. It also notes the platform’s partnership label where it can read it, such as YouTube’s paid promotion flag and Instagram’s “Paid partnership” label, and, for videos it checks, whether the creator said or showed the disclosure.
Pozto tells you what it found: a clear disclosure, a weak one, or none. It doesn’t tell you whether that is legally enough, because that depends on the country and the details. Start free with up to 10 creators.
Questions
Do influencers have to disclose gifted products?
In most countries, yes. The United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, India, South Korea and others treat a free product as a benefit that must be disclosed when the creator posts about it. In a few countries, such as Japan and Sweden, it depends on the circumstances.
Is “#gifted” enough?
It depends on the country. In the US, “Gifted by [brand]” can work for a gift with nothing else attached, but “gifted” alone is ambiguous. The UK’s CMA lists “#gifted” as unclear and asks for “Ad”. Spain’s code says “Regalo de [marca]” is not enough, and Korea says “선물” (gift) is not clear.
Is Instagram’s “Paid partnership” label enough on its own?
Not everywhere. Germany accepts a platform label if it uses the words “Werbung”, “Anzeige” or “bezahlte Werbepartnerschaft”, and the UK accepts one if it is clear. The FTC and India’s ASCI say to add your own disclosure as well. Meta’s own policy says the label doesn’t replace legal obligations.
Is the brand responsible if the creator doesn’t disclose?
Often, yes. The FTC, the UK’s CMA, Sweden’s Konsumentverket and Japan’s Consumer Affairs Agency all hold the brand responsible. Brands are expected to tell creators how to disclose and to check their posts.
Where should the disclosure go in a TikTok or Reel?
At the start of the caption, before it is cut off, and in the video itself: on screen, said out loud, or both. A disclosure only behind “more” or in a list of hashtags is easy to miss.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is a summary of official guidance, checked on 2026-10-17, with links to each source. For a specific campaign, ask a lawyer in the country concerned.
Stop chasing screenshots.
Start free with up to 10 creators, no card needed.
Start freeOr continue with Google

